Blog Posting # 836; Copyright 21 March 2025. EducateMHC
Know this! HUD-Code manufactured housing (‘MH’) is federally-regulated, performance-based, affordable-attainable, factory-built housing (a.k.a. offsite construction), contrasted with traditional stick-built housing (a.k.a. onsite construction). Then, land lease communities (a.k.a. manufactured home communities & ‘mobile home parks’) comprise the commercial real estate (‘CRE’) component of MH. And considering various types of housing finance (e.g. chattel or ‘home only’ loans & real estate-secured mortgages) describes post-production segment of MH.
EducateMHC is the official MH historian, trade term & trend tracker, as well as perennial MH information source. Contact EducateMHC via (317881-3815; email: gfa7156@aol.com, and www.educatemhc.com, to purchase Community Management in the Manufactured Housing Industry (Should be in every land lease community office nationwide!), and SWAN SONG – History of land lease communities & official record of annual MH production since 1955.
And my autobiography, From SmittyAlpha6 to MHMaven, describes personal combat adventures in Vietnam as a USMC lieutenant, a 45 year entrepreneur business career in MH & community ownership, as well as freelance consulting and authoring of nonfiction texts.
George Allen is the sole emeritus member of the Manufactured Housing Institute (‘MHI’), a founding board member of MHI’s National Communities Council (‘NCC’) division, RV/MH Hall of Fame enshrinee, the Allen Legacy columnist and editor at large for MHInsider magazine.
MH Trade Term & Trend Tracking for You!
How closely do you read the four introductory paragraphs to this weekly blog posting? Well, effective this week, within posting #836, there’s a significant trade term and trend tracking adjustment to the ‘Know this!’ admonition that begins the first paragraph.
Heretofore, HUD-Code manufactured housing (‘MH’) has been widely known as ‘federally-regulated, performance-based, affordable-attainable, factory-built housing’ – and still is! However, given the year 2023 launch, albeit relabeling, of ‘offsite construction’, to contrast and mate with ‘onsite construction’, there’s a present and ongoing need for trade term definition and trend tracking clarification.*1
Onsite construction housing. Every type single-family, residential housing constructed and erected onsite at scattered and subdivision building sites. This type housing is also commonly referred to as being ‘stick-built’ and traditional construction.
Offsite construction housing. This category of single-family, residential housing is fabricated in and shipped from offsite locations (e.g. factories) to scattered and subdivision building sites. This type housing (a.k.a. manufactured housing) generally includes factory-built products such as HUD-Code manufactured housing, modular & panelized housing, as well as Park Model RVs.
Why is this knowledge of onsite/offsite distinction important? Again – heretofore, all single-family residential construction in the U.S. has been tallied monthly and solely. as onsite construction, per U.S. Census Bureau’s online reporting. Offsite construction, however, has not been included in this reporting, except for HUD-Code manufactured housing units permanently-installed on building sites conveyed fee simple. Hence, thousands of HUD-Code homes, and hundreds of modular homes and panelized homes, as well as Park Model RVs, have never been included in these figures! Result? An ongoing but incomplete reporting of all new housing permits, starts, and completions throughout the U.S.!
This reporting deficiency is now being addressed in a monthly ‘Total U.S. Housing Completions’ report by EducateMHC. For example, U.S. Census Bureau, for the month of January 2025 reported 137,583 onsite housing completions. But when 11,923 offsite construction completions are added to that figure, there’s a grand total of 149,506 units. And when annualized with no seasonal adjustments, we see 1,794,072 new housing unit completions estimated during year 2025 – not the 1,650,996 estimated using just U.S. Census Bureau data.
So, is this ‘much ado about nothing’? Depends on one’s perspective. The way onsite housing completion data is reported now, we’re given a ‘glass half empty’ perspective. However, when offsite construction housing data is added to the U.S. Census Bureau mix, the perspective evolves to being ‘ glass half full’. Me? I prefer to know the total U.S. Housing completion story!
End Notes.
- Debut of offsite construction marked by launch of the trade magazine Offsite Builder Magazine, and a similarly-named website.
- Census.gov/construction/nrc/current/index/html
The One & Only Manufactured Housing Boom?
The Minneapolis Federal Bank, in late February, published an essay by economist James Schmitz, J., titled: ‘Learning from the first (and only) manufactured housing boom’. This is pretty much a summary of common knowledge relative to HUD-Code manufactured housing in general, and some specific aspects in particular.
Early in the report, the writer posits the “heyday of mobile homes – from the 1950s to the early 1970s…not only was this episode the first successful U.S. experiment in mass producing homes…it remains the only one.” Not! While 1973 saw acme production of ‘mobile homes’ @ 579,940 units, the industry experienced a subsequent mini-renaissance in 1998 when 372,943 new homes were produced and shipped!
And a little earlier in said report, the writer paints an incomplete picture of why there aren’t more new manufactured homes produced today. See if you can identify what’s missing here: “Manufactured homes…could be the answer for millions more households than they now serve…if not for lingering stigma, hostile zoning, and a regulatory legacy that raises costs for manufactured homes and preserves the power of traditional ‘stick-built’ home construction.” How ‘bout accessible, appropriate home financing’ of chattel or ‘home only’ type, as well as real estate-secured loans? This is the challenge for ‘outside’ folk, to accurately tell us what’s wrong with our industry.
Now here’s an interesting factoid tucked into this report, relative to past years: The city of “Urban Grove lies just feet outside of Minneapolis, (&) two of Minnesota’ smallest full-fledged cities – Hilltop and Landfall – began as mobile home communities that later incorporated.”
The writer also points out that in 1955, L.C. Michelon authored How to Build and Operate a Mobile Home Park. That was the most contemporary development and management resource he could cite. No mention at all of Community Management in the Manufactured Housing Industry, nee Mobile Home Park Management, circa 1988 and 2021. Oh well, once again that outside perspective.
A final ‘interesting perspective’ finds the writer making these observations about the stick builders and the MH industry: “…although many firms operate in the traditional homebuilding industry, the industry functions as a monopoly that inhibits innovation and competition – especially from factory construction. He sees troubling monopolistic behavior in parts of the modern manufactured housing industry as well, such as vertical integration in which the same corporate entity owns the manufacturer, lender, and park.” Probably should have gone on to say that ‘the Big 3-C’ HUD-Code manufactured housing producers control 70+/- national market share.
George Allen